Skip to content

ABC Tool

  • Home
  • About / Contect
    • PRIVACY POLICY
We still don’t have a more precise value for “Big G”

We still don’t have a more precise value for “Big G”

Posted on April 24, 2026 By safdargal12 No Comments on We still don’t have a more precise value for “Big G”
Blog

The gravitational constant, affectionally known as “Big G,” is one of the most fundamental constants of our universe. Its value describes the strength of the gravitational force acting on two masses separated by a given distance—or if you want to be relativistic about it, the amount a given mass curves space-time. Physicists have a solid ballpark figure for the value of Big G, but they’ve been trying to measure it ever more precisely for more than two centuries, each effort yielding slightly different values. And we do mean slight: The values vary by roughly one part in 10,000.

Still, other fundamental constants are known much more precisely. So Big G is the black sheep of the family and a point of frustration for physicists keen on precision metrology. The problem is that gravity is so weak, by far the weakest of the four fundamental forces, so there is significant background noise from the gravitational field of the Earth (aka “little g”). That weakness is even more pronounced in a laboratory.

In the latest effort to resolve the issue, scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) spent the last decade replicating one of the most divergent recent experimental results. The group just announced their results in a paper published in the journal Metrologia. It does not resolve the discrepancy, but it gives physicists one more data point in their ongoing quest to nail down a more precise value for Big G.

Isaac Newton introduced the concept of a gravitational constant when he published his law of universal gravitation in the late 17th century, although it didn’t get its Big G notation until the 1890s. Newton thought it might be possible to measure the strength of gravity by swinging a pendulum near a large hill and measuring the deflection, but he never attempted the experiment, reasoning that the effect would be too small to measure. By 1774, the Royal Society had established a committee to determine the density of the Earth as an indirect measurement of Big G, using a variation of Newton’s pendulum concept.



Source link

Post Views: 17

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: iPhone 18's display downgrade detailed in new report
Next Post: Parents Can Now See What Their Kids Are Asking Meta AI About ❯

You may also like

What the anti-seed oil movement gets wrong — and right
Blog
What the anti-seed oil movement gets wrong — and right
May 24, 2026
Xbox is now XBOX | The Verge
Blog
Xbox is now XBOX | The Verge
May 16, 2026
Here’s when you’ll be able to get ANBERNIC’s next handheld
Blog
Here’s when you’ll be able to get ANBERNIC’s next handheld
April 30, 2026
Say goodbye to your free time: Balatro just went on sale on Android
Blog
Say goodbye to your free time: Balatro just went on sale on Android
May 22, 2026

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Having trouble with Yahoo Mail? Here’s what’s going on
  • Apple just taught your iPhone to finish your sentences, your photos, and your workflows
  • The Best Deals Our CNET Shopping Experts Found This Week
  • Gemini needs to copy Siri’s new voice customization, yesterday
  • Apple’s Health App Now Supports Both Menopause and Perimenopause

Recent Comments

  1. Last Chance for Big Savings on TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 Tickets – Artiverse on 5 days left: Save up to $410 on Disrupt 2026 passes

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026

Categories

  • Blog

Copyright © 2026 ABC Tool.

Theme: Oceanly News by ScriptsTown