Everything you need to know about selfie video blind test davids vs.
[ad_1]We may have found a crack in the armor of some of the best camera phones on the market right now – and we want you to weigh in.
If you prefer the video explanation you can head this way for our TikTok channel, Instagram or YouTube. Otherwise just read on.
The vivo X300 Ultra and the Oppo Find X9 Ultra are two of the top camera phones of 2026, and although the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra can’t quite match them, it has the advantage of a lower price and a wider availability. Everyone’s focus is mostly on the rear cameras, but their selfie modules are respectable as well – the vivo and Oppo have 50MP sensors on the front, while the Samsung sports an optimized 12MP sensor.
We’ve been working on the Samsung Galaxy A37 and Galaxy A57 reviews and we were struck by just how good the selfie videos from these two mid-rangers turned out. Both use 12MP sensors, but lack autofocus, not to mention the flagship-class image processing hardware of the three flagships above (all three of which use the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5).
Stills from the selfie videos: Phone 1 • Phone 2 • Phone 3 • Phone 4 • Phone 5
This is where you come in – we have shot selfie video samples with all five phones that you can watch on our TikTok, Instagram and YouTube channels. You can also look at the stills above or download this high-quality video to avoid the usual streaming video compression.
Note that this is a blind test, so the clips will play in random order and we won’t reveal which video came from which phone until later. For now, we’ve just labeled them Phone 1 through 5.
Okay, while the videos are fresh in your mind, pick the one that you liked the best. If you want, you can also share your thoughts in the comments.
Just to put things into perspective, the vivo X300 Ultra has an MSRP of €2,000, while the Samsung Galaxy A37 only costs less than a sixth of that – €300. And that’s the MSRP, the street price is already lower than that.
vivo X300 Ultra 5G
We will share the results from the blind test and reveal which video came from which phone soon.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 5G
Samsung Galaxy A57 5G
[ad_2]
Source link
More on selfie video blind test davids vs
Stay tuned for updates on selfie video blind test davids vs as the story develops. Related: Infinix Note 60 Ultra Review.
Selfie video blind test davids vs: Key Details Explained
Selfie video blind test: Davids vs. Goliaths — let’s break down what actually matters here. This one stands out because it touches the things buyers care about most: performance, features, and value for money. If you’re comparing options right now, it’s worth keeping on your shortlist.
Looking at the bigger picture, this fits into a wider trend where brands compete harder with every release cycle. Expect more details to surface as things develop, including confirmed specifications and pricing from official sources.
Should You Keep Following This?
If you follow mobile tech closely, the answer is yes. Developments like this could influence your next purchase decision, so it’s worth tracking. Bookmark this page — we’ll keep the coverage fresh as the story evolves.
Frequently Asked Questions
The test compares the vivo X300 Ultra, the Oppo Find X9 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, and the Samsung Galaxy A37 and A57. The videos are labeled Phone 1 through 5, and the identities will only be revealed after voting closes.
The Galaxy A37 and A57 are mid-rangers whose selfie videos turned out surprisingly good, despite using 12MP sensors without autofocus and lacking the flagship image processing hardware of the other three phones, all of which use the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5.
The vivo X300 Ultra has an MSRP of 2,000 euros, while the Samsung Galaxy A37 costs less than a sixth of that at 300 euros. Its street price is already lower than that.
The vivo X300 Ultra and Oppo Find X9 Ultra have 50MP front sensors, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra uses an optimized 12MP sensor. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra cannot quite match the other two flagships on cameras but has a lower price and wider availability.
