Everything you need to know about apple says epic lawsuit shouldn reshape.
[ad_1]In Apple’s seemingly never-ending lawsuit with Fortnite maker Epic Games over App Store commissions, the iPhone maker is once again fighting a court’s ruling. Its latest tactic? Saying that Epic Games’ beef with Apple over its fee structure shouldn’t lead to an injunction that applies to all developers that publish on the U.S. App Store, including other tech giants like Microsoft and Spotify, which weren’t a part of this particular litigation.
“Epic never brought a class action and never attempted to show that enjoining Apple’s conduct against all other developers — like Microsoft or Spotify, who have nothing to do with Epic — was somehow necessary to provide relief to Epic,” reads Apple’s new petition, which asks the U.S. Supreme Court to review the lower court ruling.
In the same document, Apple also argues against the Ninth Circuit’s civil contempt order over Apple’s compliance with the injunction. The court had ruled that Apple must give developers the right to include links in their apps — links that could direct users to alternative payment options outside of Apple’s own system — if they chose to do so. Apple did permit this as required, but charged fees on those outside purchases, leading to the contempt order.
The Ninth Circuit said that charging fees of 27% on external payments defeated the purpose of allowing them — which, well, it did. But Apple is pushing back on specific legal grounds. Its new argument focuses on whether a federal court can hold a party in civil contempt for violating the “spirit” of an injunction when the injunction itself was written in a way that left room for interpretation and said nothing about commissions (i.e., it didn’t specifically prohibit fees on external purchases, so technically, Apple believes it did nothing wrong).
Apple has seemingly infinite money to fund its legal battles. The company has been fighting Epic’s original 2020 lawsuit for over five years now with no end in sight.
Epic Games criticized Apple’s latest move as “one last Hail Mary to delay a conclusion to this case and avoid opening up the gates to payment competition for the benefit of consumers.”
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court rejected Apple’s request to pause additional proceedings until the court could determine whether the sanctions were justified.
This week, Epic Games announced that Fortnite was back in the App Store globally (save for Australia), because it believes the court is on its side and will not allow Apple’s fee structure to stand as is.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
[ad_2]
Source link
More on apple says epic lawsuit shouldn reshape
Stay tuned for updates on apple says epic lawsuit shouldn reshape as the story develops. Related: Kaleidescape’s Strato E player blows streaming, and your wallet, away.
Apple says epic lawsuit shouldn reshape: Key Details Explained
Apple says Epic lawsuit shouldn’t reshape App Store rules for all developers — let’s break down what actually matters here. This one stands out because it touches the things buyers care about most: performance, features, and value for money. If you’re comparing options right now, it’s worth keeping on your shortlist.
Looking at the bigger picture, this fits into a wider trend where brands compete harder with every release cycle. Expect more details to surface as things develop, including confirmed specifications and pricing from official sources.
Should You Keep Following This?
If you follow mobile tech closely, the answer is yes. Developments like this could influence your next purchase decision, so it’s worth tracking. Bookmark this page — we’ll keep the coverage fresh as the story evolves.
Frequently Asked Questions
Apple argues that Epic's beef over its fee structure should not lead to an injunction that applies to all developers on the US App Store, including companies like Microsoft and Spotify that were not part of this litigation. Apple notes Epic never brought a class action and never showed that enjoining Apple's conduct against all other developers was necessary to give relief to Epic.
The Ninth Circuit held Apple in civil contempt because Apple permitted developers to link to alternative payment options outside the App Store, as required, but charged fees of 27% on those external purchases, which the court said defeated the purpose of allowing them. Apple is asking the US Supreme Court to review the lower court ruling.
Epic criticized it as one last Hail Mary to delay a conclusion to the case and avoid opening up the gates to payment competition for the benefit of consumers. Epic also announced that Fortnite was back in the App Store globally, except for Australia.
Apple has been fighting Epic's original 2020 lawsuit for over five years with no end in sight. Earlier this month, the Supreme Court rejected Apple's request to pause additional proceedings until the court could determine whether the sanctions were justified.
