Skip to content

ABC Tool

  • Home
  • About / Contect
    • PRIVACY POLICY
We still don’t have a more precise value for “Big G”

We still don’t have a more precise value for “Big G”

Posted on April 24, 2026 By safdargal12 No Comments on We still don’t have a more precise value for “Big G”
Blog

The gravitational constant, affectionally known as “Big G,” is one of the most fundamental constants of our universe. Its value describes the strength of the gravitational force acting on two masses separated by a given distance—or if you want to be relativistic about it, the amount a given mass curves space-time. Physicists have a solid ballpark figure for the value of Big G, but they’ve been trying to measure it ever more precisely for more than two centuries, each effort yielding slightly different values. And we do mean slight: The values vary by roughly one part in 10,000.

Still, other fundamental constants are known much more precisely. So Big G is the black sheep of the family and a point of frustration for physicists keen on precision metrology. The problem is that gravity is so weak, by far the weakest of the four fundamental forces, so there is significant background noise from the gravitational field of the Earth (aka “little g”). That weakness is even more pronounced in a laboratory.

In the latest effort to resolve the issue, scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) spent the last decade replicating one of the most divergent recent experimental results. The group just announced their results in a paper published in the journal Metrologia. It does not resolve the discrepancy, but it gives physicists one more data point in their ongoing quest to nail down a more precise value for Big G.

Isaac Newton introduced the concept of a gravitational constant when he published his law of universal gravitation in the late 17th century, although it didn’t get its Big G notation until the 1890s. Newton thought it might be possible to measure the strength of gravity by swinging a pendulum near a large hill and measuring the deflection, but he never attempted the experiment, reasoning that the effect would be too small to measure. By 1774, the Royal Society had established a committee to determine the density of the Earth as an indirect measurement of Big G, using a variation of Newton’s pendulum concept.



Source link

Post Views: 18

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: iPhone 18's display downgrade detailed in new report
Next Post: Parents Can Now See What Their Kids Are Asking Meta AI About ❯

You may also like

Enhancements to the App Store featuring process – Latest News
Blog
Enhancements to the App Store featuring process – Latest News
May 1, 2026
GitHub – vinhnx/VTCode: VT Code
Blog
GitHub – vinhnx/VTCode: VT Code
April 25, 2026
This could be 2026’s best smartphone, if only it didn’t rip off Apple’s Liquid Glass
Blog
This could be 2026’s best smartphone, if only it didn’t rip off Apple’s Liquid Glass
April 22, 2026
Musk and Altman face off in trial that will determine OpenAI’s future
Blog
Musk and Altman face off in trial that will determine OpenAI’s future
April 27, 2026

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • MacOS Golden Gate Gets Better Search, Smarter Siri, Greater Liquid Glass Control and More
  • Samsung Galaxy Watch9 and Watch Ultra 2's charging speeds revealed as they get 3C certified
  • Google Photos needs an answer to Apple Photos’ new reframing tool
  • Apple Debuts New AI Models Built With Gemini
  • Apple’s iPhone software support is putting Pixel, Galaxy to shame

Recent Comments

  1. Last Chance for Big Savings on TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 Tickets – Artiverse on 5 days left: Save up to $410 on Disrupt 2026 passes

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026

Categories

  • Blog

Copyright © 2026 ABC Tool.

Theme: Oceanly News by ScriptsTown